An electric-aircraft proposal creates a new relationship between the flying schedule and the airfield’s electrical system. The owner’s decision is how to support the intended training day through charging, ground operations and interruptions. For an investor, the question is whether the fleet and infrastructure assumptions describe one workable operating plan rather than two separate procurement ideas.

Preserve the proposal’s actual status

ALFA’s whitepaper describes West Rift Aviation’s signed, non-binding letter of intent dated 20 January 2026 for 20 Volar RX4E training aircraft in the programme. It records a proposed delivery sequence of five per year. Commercial terms, technical specifications, regulatory approvals and definitive agreements remain to be completed.

The source expressly treats the programme as a development pathway, with no aircraft deliveries asserted. Any energy design would therefore be a preparation exercise based on specifications still to be finalised, rather than evidence of an operating electric fleet or completed airfield installation.

Build the energy demand from the mission

The training operator should describe intended sorties, ground time, daily scheduling and the aircraft manufacturer’s applicable charging requirements. The electrical team can then evaluate simultaneous demand and the available charging windows. An annual energy total cannot show whether several aircraft need attention during the same short interval.

The operating plan should test delays as well as the ideal timetable. A late arrival, unavailable charger or restricted power supply may change the sequence of training. The owner needs to understand which assumptions can be adjusted and which directly limit the planned service.

Keep aircraft approval and site engineering connected

EASA’s certification memorandum describes electric and hybrid propulsion as an integrated system involving elements such as batteries, distribution, cooling and power management. It is a useful technical reference for the importance of system boundaries. It does not establish approval of West Rift’s programme or determine the requirements of its operating jurisdiction.

The project must obtain the applicable aircraft, operating and site approvals through its actual authorities and counterparties. Infrastructure decisions should follow verified manufacturer information and qualified design, including the interfaces between aircraft, chargers, electrical supply and emergency arrangements.

Evaluate solar as one part of the supply

Solar generation could be investigated against the charging timetable, while storage and grid supply require their own duty and connection studies. NREL’s PV and storage guide supports examining load profiles, system configuration and operating requirements together. None of those options automatically establishes reliable charging at the required time.

A phased fleet proposal can make infrastructure preparation more manageable if each phase has clear acceptance criteria. The useful milestone is an approved, commissioned and tested service capability matched to the aircraft that can actually be introduced. That gives the training operator an operating decision and the investor a concrete account of what readiness means.

References
  1. ALFA whitepaper, October 2026 ↗
  2. EASA, Acceptable approaches for certification of Electric/Hybrid Propulsion Systems ↗
  3. NREL, Best Practices for PV and Energy Storage O&M, third edition ↗